PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRBFX vs. BIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRBFX vs. BIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRBFX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SRBFX has outperformed BIV with an annualized return of 2.30%, while BIV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.94% annualized return.


SRBFX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.66%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
-0.30%
10Y*
2.30%

BIV

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
1.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRBFX vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRBFX
Columbia Total Return Bond Fund
0.60%8.91%1.49%7.35%-17.65%0.23%12.20%9.44%0.38%3.84%
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
-0.02%8.52%1.57%6.07%-13.21%-2.40%9.67%10.34%-0.19%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SRBFX and BIV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007

0.83

The correlation between SRBFX and BIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRBFX vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRBFX
SRBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SRBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SRBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRBFX vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRBFXBIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

1.24

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

1.85

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.22

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

1.49

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.17

4.56

+1.61

SRBFX vs. BIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the BIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRBFX and BIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRBFXBIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.24

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.06

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.35

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.65

+0.17

Drawdowns

SRBFX vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRBFX drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, which is greater than BIV's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRBFX and BIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRBFXBIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.34%

-18.95%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-3.18%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.28%

-6.07%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

-18.74%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.97%

-18.95%

-4.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-1.82%

-1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-3.39%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.04%

0.00%

Volatility

SRBFX vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) at 1.38%. This indicates that SRBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRBFXBIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.38%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

2.92%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.46%

4.06%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.63%

6.40%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.45%

5.50%

-0.05%

SRBFX vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRBFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRBFX vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison

SRBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than BIV's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.21%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%
SRBFX
Columbia Total Return Bond Fund
4.86%4.86%4.11%3.74%3.72%3.23%7.56%4.59%2.85%2.77%3.93%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SRBFX and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SRBFX has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to BIV (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRBFX dropped -24.34% vs BIV's -18.95%.

SRBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRBFX and BIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer