PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRBFX vs. GUGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRBFX vs. GUGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRBFX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than GUGAX's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SRBFX has outperformed GUGAX with an annualized return of 2.30%, while GUGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.51% annualized return.


SRBFX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.28%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.28%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
2.30%

GUGAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.96%
6M
1.07%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
-0.52%
10Y*
1.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRBFX vs. GUGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRBFX
Columbia Total Return Bond Fund
0.79%8.91%1.49%7.35%-17.65%0.23%12.20%9.44%0.38%3.84%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
0.96%7.29%0.96%6.02%-14.52%-3.17%4.91%9.66%2.13%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SRBFX and GUGAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998

0.74

The correlation between SRBFX and GUGAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRBFX vs. GUGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRBFX
SRBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SRBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SRBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GUGAX
GUGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GUGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GUGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRBFX vs. GUGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SRBFXGUGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

4.82

-2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.28

14.23

-8.95

SRBFX vs. GUGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the GUGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRBFX and GUGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRBFX vs. GUGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRBFX drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, smaller than the maximum GUGAX drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRBFX and GUGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRBFXGUGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.34%

-38.57%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-1.16%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.28%

-6.12%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

-20.53%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.97%

-23.06%

+0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

-6.72%

+3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-11.26%

+6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.39%

+0.70%

Volatility

SRBFX vs. GUGAX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that SRBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRBFXGUGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

0.00%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

1.30%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

2.80%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

6.57%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.45%

5.42%

+0.03%

SRBFX vs. GUGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRBFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GUGAX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRBFX vs. GUGAX - Dividend Comparison

SRBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than GUGAX's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
4.52%3.69%4.34%0.00%1.94%2.90%7.96%5.74%5.08%2.43%3.29%1.76%
SRBFX
Columbia Total Return Bond Fund
4.85%4.86%4.11%3.74%3.72%3.23%7.56%4.59%2.85%2.77%3.93%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRBFX and GUGAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRBFX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRBFX dropped -24.34% vs GUGAX's -38.57%.

GUGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRBFX and GUGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer