PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUGAX vs. GMCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUGAX vs. GMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUGAX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than GMCDX's 8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GUGAX has underperformed GMCDX with an annualized return of 1.52%, while GMCDX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.82% annualized return.


GUGAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.99%
1Y
5.99%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*
1.52%

GMCDX

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.20%
YTD
8.34%
6M
9.25%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUGAX vs. GMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
0.96%7.29%0.96%6.02%-14.52%-3.17%4.91%9.66%2.13%4.44%
GMCDX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund
8.34%22.34%13.39%17.63%-16.30%6.56%7.25%14.28%-5.89%12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GUGAX and GMCDX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.29

The correlation between GUGAX and GMCDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUGAX vs. GMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUGAX
GUGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GUGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GUGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GMCDX
GMCDX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GMCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GMCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUGAX vs. GMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUGAXGMCDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

5.07

-3.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.31

9.08

-5.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

2.27

-0.83

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

6.93

-2.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.88

30.08

-16.20

GUGAX vs. GMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the GMCDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUGAX and GMCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUGAXGMCDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

5.07

-3.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.86

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.84

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.32

-0.23

Drawdowns

GUGAX vs. GMCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUGAX drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, smaller than the maximum GMCDX drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUGAX and GMCDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUGAXGMCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.57%

-68.24%

+29.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.16%

-3.85%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.12%

-9.00%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.53%

-26.02%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.06%

-26.02%

+2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.72%

-0.04%

-6.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-17.66%

+6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.89%

-0.46%

Volatility

GUGAX vs. GMCDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) is 0.00%, while GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX) has a volatility of 1.53%. This indicates that GUGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUGAXGMCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

1.53%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.44%

4.37%

-2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

5.31%

-2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.57%

11.20%

-4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.43%

9.33%

-3.90%

GUGAX vs. GMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUGAX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GMCDX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUGAX vs. GMCDX - Dividend Comparison

GUGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than GMCDX's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMCDX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund
5.79%6.27%6.88%10.26%13.73%17.75%9.66%6.60%7.76%7.06%6.00%2.50%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
4.52%3.69%4.34%0.00%1.94%2.90%7.96%5.74%5.08%2.43%3.29%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUGAX and GMCDX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMCDX has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUGAX dropped -38.57% vs GMCDX's -68.24%.

GMCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.07 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUGAX and GMCDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer