SRBFX vs. AMFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX).
SRBFX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Dec 5, 1978. AMFIX is managed by AAMA. It was launched on Jun 30, 2017.
Performance
SRBFX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SRBFX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRBFX Columbia Total Return Bond Fund | -0.73% | 8.91% | 1.49% | 7.35% | -17.65% | 0.23% | 12.20% | 9.44% | 0.38% | 0.18% |
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund | 0.21% | 3.74% | 3.48% | 3.84% | -6.26% | -1.37% | 2.24% | 2.47% | 0.89% | -0.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRBFX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than AMFIX's 0.21% return.
SRBFX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
AMFIX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SRBFX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRBFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SRBFX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank
SRBFX
AMFIX
SRBFX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRBFX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 3.05 | -1.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 4.95 | -3.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.69 | -0.51 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 4.18 | -2.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 21.12 | -15.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRBFX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 3.05 | -1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.34 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.56 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between SRBFX and AMFIX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SRBFX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison
SRBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than AMFIX's 2.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRBFX Columbia Total Return Bond Fund | 4.49% | 4.86% | 4.11% | 3.74% | 3.72% | 3.23% | 7.56% | 4.59% | 2.85% | 2.77% | 3.93% | 3.42% |
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund | 2.22% | 2.08% | 2.44% | 1.70% | 0.83% | 0.57% | 0.83% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SRBFX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRBFX drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRBFX and AMFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRBFX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -9.35% | -14.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -0.74% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.97% | -8.91% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.41% | -0.49% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -2.06% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.15% | +0.84% |
Volatility
SRBFX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.48%. This indicates that SRBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SRBFX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 0.48% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | 0.72% | +2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.91% | 0.98% | +3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.58% | 2.16% | +4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 1.75% | +3.67% |