SQY vs. YBIT
SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) and YBIT (YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while YBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SQY returned -0.20% vs -35.27% for YBIT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SQY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for YBIT.
Performance
SQY vs. YBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQY achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly higher than YBIT's -24.59% return.
SQY
- 1D
- -5.22%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- -0.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBIT
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -15.67%
- YTD
- -24.59%
- 6M
- -27.08%
- 1Y
- -35.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQY vs. YBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.01% | -29.43% | 22.50% |
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.59% | -2.49% | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQY and YBIT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2024 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQY vs. YBIT — Risk / Return Rank
SQY
YBIT
SQY vs. YBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SQY | YBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.84 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | -0.78 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | -1.43 | +1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQY | YBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | -0.98 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | -0.35 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
SQY vs. YBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than YBIT's maximum drawdown of -45.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQY and YBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQY | YBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.30% | -45.54% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.72% | -45.54% | +7.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.84% | -43.10% | +5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -15.12% | -6.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.18% | 24.69% | -7.51% |
Volatility
SQY vs. YBIT - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) at 7.77%. This indicates that SQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQY | YBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.82% | 7.77% | +3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.08% | 29.10% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.83% | 36.10% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.20% | 38.63% | +3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.20% | 38.63% | +3.57% |
SQY vs. YBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than YBIT's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQY vs. YBIT - Dividend Comparison
SQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.42%, more than YBIT's 101.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 109.42% | 95.35% | 62.54% | 9.85% |
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | 101.02% | 88.33% | 60.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQY and YBIT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQY has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to YBIT (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQY dropped -52.30% vs YBIT's -45.54%.
On 1-year performance, SQY leads with -0.20% vs -35.27% for YBIT. On fees, YBIT is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YBIT has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SQY has performed better with a -0.20% return vs -35.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YBIT is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.
SQY has the higher dividend yield at 109.42%, compared with 101.02% for YBIT.
SQY is categorized as Derivative Income, while YBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.99% for YBIT.
SQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQY and YBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer