SQY vs. XDTE
SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) and XDTE (Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SQY returned -0.20% vs 25.68% for XDTE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SQY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for XDTE.
Performance
SQY vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQY achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than XDTE's 8.83% return.
SQY
- 1D
- -5.22%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- -0.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDTE
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 25.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQY vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.01% | -29.43% | 24.87% |
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 8.83% | 12.60% | 16.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQY and XDTE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between SQY and XDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQY vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank
SQY
XDTE
SQY vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SQY | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.43 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 3.36 | -3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 15.35 | -15.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQY | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 2.35 | -2.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 1.25 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
SQY vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQY and XDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQY | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.30% | -19.09% | -33.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.72% | -7.68% | -30.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.84% | -0.66% | -37.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -2.32% | -19.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.18% | 1.68% | +15.50% |
Volatility
SQY vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) at 2.53%. This indicates that SQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQY | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.82% | 2.53% | +8.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.08% | 8.28% | +22.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.83% | 10.99% | +27.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.20% | 13.85% | +28.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.20% | 13.85% | +28.35% |
SQY vs. XDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than XDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQY vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison
SQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.42%, more than XDTE's 33.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 109.42% | 95.35% | 62.54% | 9.85% |
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 33.00% | 39.16% | 20.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQY and XDTE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQY has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to XDTE (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQY dropped -52.30% vs XDTE's -19.09%.
On 1-year performance, XDTE leads with 25.68% vs -0.20% for SQY. On fees, XDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, XDTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XDTE has performed better with a 25.68% return vs -0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.
SQY has the higher dividend yield at 109.42%, compared with 33.00% for XDTE.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.97% for XDTE.
XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQY and XDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer