PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQY vs. TSMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQY vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQY achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 37.04% return.


SQY

1D
-5.22%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
-1.01%
6M
6.08%
1Y
-0.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMY

1D
-1.37%
1M
7.48%
YTD
37.04%
6M
39.21%
1Y
92.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQY vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SQY
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF
-1.01%-29.43%23.16%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
37.04%41.00%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SQY and TSMY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQY vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQY
SQY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQY vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SQYTSMYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.01

3.21

-3.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.26

3.86

-3.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.50

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

5.98

-5.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.01

22.18

-22.19

SQY vs. TSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQY Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the TSMY Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQY and TSMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SQYTSMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

3.21

-3.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.56

-1.36

Drawdowns

SQY vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than TSMY's maximum drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQY and TSMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQYTSMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.30%

-31.15%

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.72%

-15.50%

-22.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.84%

-1.37%

-36.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-5.51%

-16.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.18%

4.17%

+13.01%

Volatility

SQY vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) at 9.52%. This indicates that SQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQYTSMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.82%

9.52%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.08%

22.68%

+8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.83%

28.87%

+9.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.20%

33.22%

+8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.20%

33.22%

+8.98%

SQY vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQY vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison

SQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.42%, more than TSMY's 52.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
SQY
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF
109.42%95.35%62.54%9.85%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
52.19%56.76%13.71%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SQY and TSMY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQY has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to TSMY (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQY dropped -52.30% vs TSMY's -31.15%.

On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 92.13% vs -0.20% for SQY. On fees, TSMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSMY has been the lower-risk option at 9.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 92.13% return vs -0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.

SQY has the higher dividend yield at 109.42%, compared with 52.19% for TSMY.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.99% for TSMY.

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQY and TSMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer