SQY vs. HYTI
SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) and HYTI (FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. SQY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for HYTI.
Performance
SQY vs. HYTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYTI
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQY vs. HYTI — Risk / Return Rank
SQY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYTI
SQY vs. HYTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQY | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQY vs. HYTI - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQY | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.21% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.45% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.56% | — |
Volatility
SQY vs. HYTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQY | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.86% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 5.16% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 5.16% | — |
SQY vs. HYTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than HYTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQY vs. HYTI - Dividend Comparison
SQY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 10.40% | 8.10% |
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HYTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.
HYTI has the higher dividend yield at 10.40%, compared with 0.00% for SQY.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.65% for HYTI.
Find the right allocation for SQY and HYTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer