PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQS vs. NXTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQS vs. NXTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SQS

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.44%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NXTE

1D
-3.83%
1M
1.53%
6M
36.19%
YTD
36.19%
1Y
55.04%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQS vs. NXTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SQS and NXTE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQS vs. NXTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQS vs. NXTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SQSNXTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

SQS vs. NXTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SQS vs. NXTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQS drawdown since its inception was -7.90%, smaller than the maximum NXTE drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQS and NXTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQSNXTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-28.64%

+20.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-3.83%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-7.79%

+5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

Volatility

SQS vs. NXTE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQSNXTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

28.34%

-9.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

26.83%

-7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

26.83%

-7.90%

SQS vs. NXTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTE's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQS vs. NXTE - Dividend Comparison

SQS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.48%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%
SQS
Sapient Quality Select ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SQS and NXTE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SQS is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SQS is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

NXTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for SQS.

They also come from different issuers: Sapient and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SQS and 1.00% for NXTE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQS and NXTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer