SQS vs. NXTE
SQS (Sapient Quality Select ETF) and NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SQS charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for NXTE.
Performance
SQS vs. NXTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQS
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXTE
- 1D
- -3.83%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 36.19%
- YTD
- 36.19%
- 1Y
- 55.04%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQS vs. NXTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 8.85% |
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 33.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQS and NXTE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQS vs. NXTE — Risk / Return Rank
SQS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NXTE
SQS vs. NXTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQS | NXTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQS vs. NXTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQS drawdown since its inception was -7.90%, smaller than the maximum NXTE drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQS and NXTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQS | NXTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -28.64% | +20.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -3.83% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -7.79% | +5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.46% | — |
Volatility
SQS vs. NXTE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQS | NXTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.93% | 28.34% | -9.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 26.83% | -7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 26.83% | -7.90% |
SQS vs. NXTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTE's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQS vs. NXTE - Dividend Comparison
SQS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 0.48% | 0.36% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.13% |
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQS and NXTE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SQS is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SQS is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.
NXTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for SQS.
They also come from different issuers: Sapient and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SQS and 1.00% for NXTE.
Find the right allocation for SQS and NXTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer