SQS vs. HAIL
SQS (Sapient Quality Select ETF) and HAIL (SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF) are both Global Equities funds. SQS is actively managed, while HAIL is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SQS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HAIL.
Performance
SQS vs. HAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQS
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAIL
- 1D
- -8.01%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 21.08%
- 6M
- 17.54%
- 1Y
- 43.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- -6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
SQS vs. HAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 8.21% |
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 20.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQS and HAIL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQS vs. HAIL — Risk / Return Rank
SQS
HAIL
SQS vs. HAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQS | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 0.17 | +2.07 |
Drawdowns
SQS vs. HAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQS drawdown since its inception was -7.18%, smaller than the maximum HAIL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQS and HAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQS | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -65.98% | +58.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -36.14% | +32.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -31.60% | +30.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.19% | — |
Volatility
SQS vs. HAIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQS | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 30.37% | -11.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 31.99% | -13.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 31.84% | -13.02% |
SQS vs. HAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HAIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQS vs. HAIL - Dividend Comparison
SQS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 1.56% | 2.00% | 2.98% | 2.62% | 2.09% | 1.36% | 0.52% | 1.17% | 2.54% |
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQS and HAIL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HAIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HAIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SQS.
HAIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for SQS.
They also come from different issuers: Sapient and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SQS and 0.45% for HAIL.
Find the right allocation for SQS and HAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer