PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQS vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQS vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SQS

1D
-3.19%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDVL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
3.52%
6M
3.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQS vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SQS and BDVL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQS vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SQS vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SQSBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

0.81

+1.43

Drawdowns

SQS vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQS drawdown since its inception was -7.18%, smaller than the maximum BDVL drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQS and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQSBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-7.71%

+0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.14%

-2.08%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-1.19%

-0.01%

Volatility

SQS vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQSBDVLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

9.62%

+9.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.82%

9.62%

+9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

9.62%

+9.20%

SQS vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQS vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

SQS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SQS and BDVL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SQS.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for SQS.

They also come from different issuers: Sapient and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SQS and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQS and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer