PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQQQ vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQQQ vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQQQ achieves a -45.27% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of -56.01%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.


SQQQ

1D
0.76%
1M
-26.37%
YTD
-45.27%
6M
-42.79%
1Y
-65.16%
3Y*
-56.19%
5Y*
-49.17%
10Y*
-56.01%

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQQQ vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-45.27%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SQQQ and SLV is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

-0.17

The correlation between SQQQ and SLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SQQQ vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SQQQ
SLV

Financial Services

97.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

SQQQ
97.1%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

SQQQ

-

SLV
100.0%

Communication Services

SQQQ

-

SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

SQQQ

-

SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

SQQQ

-

SLV

-

Energy

SQQQ

-

SLV

-

Healthcare

SQQQ

-

SLV

-

Industrials

SQQQ

-

SLV

-

Real Estate

SQQQ

-

SLV

-

Technology

SQQQ

-

SLV

-

Utilities

SQQQ

-

SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQQQ vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQQQ vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SQQQSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.72

1.35

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

2.62

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.82

5.64

-7.47

SQQQ vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQQQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.37, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQQQ and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SQQQSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.37

1.89

-3.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.74

0.58

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.85

0.49

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.88

0.25

-1.12

Drawdowns

SQQQ vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQQQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQQQ and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQQQSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-76.28%

-23.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.95%

-42.45%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.38%

-42.45%

-49.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.23%

-42.45%

-54.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

-42.81%

-57.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-37.30%

-62.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.40%

-44.67%

-47.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.73%

19.67%

+16.06%

Volatility

SQQQ vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) is 13.75%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that SQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQQQSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.75%

16.30%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.45%

58.31%

-21.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.79%

58.90%

-11.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.64%

36.15%

+30.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.11%

31.84%

+34.27%

SQQQ vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQQQ vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
12.48%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SQQQ and SLV have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to SQQQ (13.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQQQ dropped -100.00% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs -56.01% for SQQQ. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs -56.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

SQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SLV is Silver. SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SQQQ and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQQQ and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer