SQQQ vs. SLV
SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ returned -56.01%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. SQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
SQQQ vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQQQ achieves a -45.27% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of -56.01%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
SQQQ
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -26.37%
- YTD
- -45.27%
- 6M
- -42.79%
- 1Y
- -65.16%
- 3Y*
- -56.19%
- 5Y*
- -49.17%
- 10Y*
- -56.01%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
SQQQ vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -45.27% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQQQ and SLV is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010 | -0.17 |
The correlation between SQQQ and SLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SQQQ vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SQQQ
SLV
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SQQQ
SLV
-
Basic Materials
SQQQ
-
SLV
Communication Services
SQQQ
-
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
SQQQ
-
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
SQQQ
-
SLV
-
Energy
SQQQ
-
SLV
-
Healthcare
SQQQ
-
SLV
-
Industrials
SQQQ
-
SLV
-
Real Estate
SQQQ
-
SLV
-
Technology
SQQQ
-
SLV
-
Utilities
SQQQ
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQQQ vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
SQQQ
SLV
SQQQ vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SQQQ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.35 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 2.62 | -3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.82 | 5.64 | -7.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQQQ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.37 | 1.89 | -3.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.74 | 0.58 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.85 | 0.49 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.88 | 0.25 | -1.12 |
Drawdowns
SQQQ vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQQQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQQQ and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQQQ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -76.28% | -23.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.95% | -42.45% | -23.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.38% | -42.45% | -49.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.23% | -42.45% | -54.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -42.81% | -57.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -37.30% | -62.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.40% | -44.67% | -47.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.73% | 19.67% | +16.06% |
Volatility
SQQQ vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) is 13.75%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that SQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQQQ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.75% | 16.30% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.45% | 58.31% | -21.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.79% | 58.90% | -11.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.64% | 36.15% | +30.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.11% | 31.84% | +34.27% |
SQQQ vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQQQ vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 12.48% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQQQ and SLV have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to SQQQ (13.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQQQ dropped -100.00% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs -56.01% for SQQQ. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs -56.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
SQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SLV is Silver. SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SQQQ and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQQQ and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer