SQQQ vs. SIL
SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ returned -55.01%/yr vs 6.32%/yr for SIL. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. SQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
SQQQ vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQQQ achieves a -39.73% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's -9.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ has underperformed SIL with an annualized return of -55.01%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively higher 6.32% annualized return.
SQQQ
- 1D
- -5.55%
- 1M
- 11.44%
- 6M
- -41.66%
- YTD
- -39.73%
- 1Y
- -53.42%
- 3Y*
- -52.07%
- 5Y*
- -45.43%
- 10Y*
- -55.01%
- ALL TIME*
- -52.98%
SIL
- 1D
- 5.77%
- 1M
- -9.67%
- 6M
- -26.85%
- YTD
- -9.44%
- 1Y
- 52.77%
- 3Y*
- 42.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.65%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.45%
SQQQ vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -39.73% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -9.44% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQQQ and SIL is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | -0.27 |
The correlation between SQQQ and SIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.42 (1 year) to -0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SQQQ vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SQQQ
SIL
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SQQQ
SIL
-
Basic Materials
SQQQ
-
SIL
Communication Services
SQQQ
-
SIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SQQQ
-
SIL
-
Consumer Defensive
SQQQ
-
SIL
Energy
SQQQ
-
SIL
-
Healthcare
SQQQ
-
SIL
-
Industrials
SQQQ
-
SIL
-
Real Estate
SQQQ
-
SIL
-
Technology
SQQQ
-
SIL
-
Utilities
SQQQ
-
SIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQQQ vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
SQQQ
SIL
SQQQ vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQQQ | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.20 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 1.35 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.58 | 3.02 | -4.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQQQ vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQQQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SIL's maximum drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQQQ and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQQQ | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -82.99% | -17.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.03% | -39.41% | -21.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.51% | -39.41% | -53.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.27% | -48.73% | -48.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.97% | -63.04% | -36.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -35.92% | -64.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.76% | -51.30% | -41.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.87% | 17.55% | +16.32% |
Volatility
SQQQ vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a higher volatility of 21.47% compared to Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) at 13.26%. This indicates that SQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQQQ | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.47% | 13.26% | +8.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.64% | 44.40% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.29% | 53.25% | +3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.96% | 40.04% | +27.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.62% | 39.81% | +26.81% |
SQQQ vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQQQ vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.91%, more than SIL's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.35% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.91% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQQQ and SIL have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (21.47%) compared to SIL (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQQQ dropped -100.00% vs SIL's -82.99%.
On 10-year performance, SIL leads with 6.32% vs -55.01% for SQQQ. On fees, SIL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SIL has been the lower-risk option at 13.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SIL has performed better with a 6.32% return vs -55.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.91%, compared with 1.35% for SIL.
SQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SIL is Silver. SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SQQQ and 0.65% for SIL.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQQQ and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer