SQQQ vs. SH
SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while SH is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ returned -56.24%/yr vs -12.90%/yr for SH. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SH.
Performance
SQQQ vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQQQ achieves a -40.31% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -5.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ has underperformed SH with an annualized return of -56.24%, while SH has yielded a comparatively higher -12.90% annualized return.
SQQQ
- 1D
- 9.83%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -40.31%
- 6M
- -37.80%
- 1Y
- -61.11%
- 3Y*
- -53.86%
- 5Y*
- -46.89%
- 10Y*
- -56.24%
SH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- -5.55%
- 6M
- -4.58%
- 1Y
- -14.55%
- 3Y*
- -11.90%
- 5Y*
- -8.40%
- 10Y*
- -12.90%
SQQQ vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.31% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -5.55% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQQQ and SH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SQQQ and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SQQQ vs. SH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SQQQ
SH
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SQQQ
SH
Basic Materials
SQQQ
-
SH
-
Communication Services
SQQQ
-
SH
-
Consumer Cyclical
SQQQ
-
SH
-
Consumer Defensive
SQQQ
-
SH
-
Energy
SQQQ
-
SH
-
Healthcare
SQQQ
-
SH
-
Industrials
SQQQ
-
SH
-
Real Estate
SQQQ
-
SH
-
Technology
SQQQ
-
SH
-
Utilities
SQQQ
-
SH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQQQ vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
SQQQ
SH
SQQQ vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQQQ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.82 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | -0.89 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | -1.67 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQQQ vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQQQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SH's maximum drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQQQ and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQQQ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -94.66% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.52% | -16.42% | -47.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.51% | -38.82% | -53.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.27% | -44.53% | -52.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -76.12% | -23.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -94.48% | -5.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.73% | -67.78% | -24.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.37% | 9.62% | +26.75% |
Volatility
SQQQ vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a higher volatility of 26.69% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 4.80%. This indicates that SQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQQQ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.69% | 4.80% | +21.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.33% | 9.83% | +33.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.65% | 12.46% | +41.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.53% | 16.95% | +50.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.47% | 18.03% | +48.44% |
SQQQ vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQQQ vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.44%, more than SH's 4.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.39% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 11.44% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SQQQ and SH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.69%) compared to SH (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQQQ dropped -100.00% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.90% vs -56.24% for SQQQ. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.90% return vs -56.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.44%, compared with 4.39% for SH.
SQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SH is Inverse Equities. SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while SH tracks S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SQQQ and 0.89% for SH.
SQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.14 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQQQ and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer