PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQQQ vs. SH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQQQ vs. SH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQQQ achieves a -45.27% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ has underperformed SH with an annualized return of -56.01%, while SH has yielded a comparatively higher -12.89% annualized return.


SQQQ

1D
0.76%
1M
-26.37%
YTD
-45.27%
6M
-42.79%
1Y
-65.16%
3Y*
-56.19%
5Y*
-49.17%
10Y*
-56.01%

SH

1D
0.70%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-8.00%
6M
-7.59%
1Y
-17.23%
3Y*
-13.02%
5Y*
-9.07%
10Y*
-12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQQQ vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-45.27%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
-8.00%-11.35%-13.52%-14.80%18.98%-24.21%-25.09%-22.12%4.93%-17.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SQQQ and SH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.90

The correlation between SQQQ and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SQQQ vs. SH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SQQQ
SH

Financial Services

97.1%
91.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

SQQQ
97.1%
SH
91.6%

Basic Materials

SQQQ

-

SH

-

Communication Services

SQQQ

-

SH

-

Consumer Cyclical

SQQQ

-

SH

-

Consumer Defensive

SQQQ

-

SH

-

Energy

SQQQ

-

SH

-

Healthcare

SQQQ

-

SH

-

Industrials

SQQQ

-

SH

-

Real Estate

SQQQ

-

SH

-

Technology

SQQQ

-

SH

-

Utilities

SQQQ

-

SH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQQQ vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SH
SH Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQQQ vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SQQQSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.72

0.77

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.95

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.82

-1.75

-0.08

SQQQ vs. SH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQQQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.37, which is comparable to the SH Sharpe Ratio of -1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQQQ and SH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SQQQSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.37

-1.47

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.74

-0.54

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.85

-0.72

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.88

-0.59

-0.29

Drawdowns

SQQQ vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQQQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SH's maximum drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQQQ and SH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQQQSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-94.66%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.95%

-18.28%

-47.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.38%

-38.82%

-53.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.23%

-44.53%

-52.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

-76.12%

-23.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-94.62%

-5.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.40%

-67.73%

-24.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.73%

9.89%

+25.84%

Volatility

SQQQ vs. SH - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a higher volatility of 13.75% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 2.84%. This indicates that SQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQQQSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.75%

2.84%

+10.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.45%

8.91%

+27.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.79%

11.80%

+35.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.64%

16.85%

+49.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.11%

18.01%

+48.10%

SQQQ vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQQQ vs. SH - Dividend Comparison

SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, more than SH's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
4.51%4.49%6.20%5.37%1.08%0.00%0.16%1.76%1.01%0.06%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
12.48%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SQQQ and SH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SQQQ has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQQQ dropped -100.00% vs SH's -94.66%.

On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.89% vs -56.01% for SQQQ. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.89% return vs -56.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 4.51% for SH.

SQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SH is Inverse Equities. SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SQQQ and 0.90% for SH.

SQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.37 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQQQ and SH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer