SQM vs. LHX
SQM (Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.) and LHX (L3Harris Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. SQM operates in Chemicals (Basic Materials), while LHX operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SQM returned 18.11%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for LHX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SQM vs. LHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQM achieves a 23.66% return, which is significantly higher than LHX's 5.64% return. Over the past 10 years, SQM has outperformed LHX with an annualized return of 18.11%, while LHX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.45% annualized return.
SQM
- 1D
- 4.57%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- 23.66%
- 6M
- 29.46%
- 1Y
- 160.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.73%
- 10Y*
- 18.11%
LHX
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- 1Y
- 21.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 16.45%
SQM vs. LHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 23.66% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -18.47% | 71.62% | 6.82% | 89.19% | -27.30% | -32.71% | 115.00% |
LHX L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | 5.64% | 42.28% | 1.88% | 3.67% | -0.48% | 14.98% | -2.76% | 49.21% | -3.38% | 40.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQM and LHX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 1993 | 0.23 |
The correlation between SQM and LHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SQM:
$2.86
LHX:
$12.29
SQM:
29.39
LHX:
25.05
SQM:
0.17
LHX:
12.84
SQM:
4.52
LHX:
1.93
SQM:
$5.31B
LHX:
$22.48B
SQM:
$1.83B
LHX:
$5.50B
SQM:
$1.75B
LHX:
$3.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQM vs. LHX — Risk / Return Rank
SQM
LHX
SQM vs. LHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQM | LHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.18 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.77 | 1.22 | +5.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.12 | 3.16 | +15.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQM vs. LHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQM drawdown since its inception was -78.34%, which is greater than LHX's maximum drawdown of -69.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQM and LHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQM | LHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.34% | -69.82% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.11% | -20.55% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.32% | -25.98% | -35.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.76% | -38.16% | -31.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.98% | -38.16% | -34.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.19% | -18.06% | +3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.32% | -21.33% | -8.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.17% | 7.89% | +0.28% |
Volatility
SQM vs. LHX - Volatility Comparison
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) at 7.33%. This indicates that SQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQM | LHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.55% | 7.33% | +8.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.28% | 19.85% | +16.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.44% | 24.63% | +26.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.87% | 23.95% | +25.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.13% | 25.44% | +20.69% |
Dividends
SQM vs. LHX - Dividend Comparison
SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than LHX's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHX L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | 1.59% | 1.64% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.80% | 1.45% | 1.86% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.23% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 1.37% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Financials
SQM vs. LHX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. and L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SQM vs. LHX - Profitability Comparison
SQM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 778.60M and revenue of 1.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.
LHX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.40B and revenue of 5.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
SQM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 729.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.
LHX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 652.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.
SQM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a net income of 364.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.
LHX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 512.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SQM and LHX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQM has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to LHX (7.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQM dropped -78.34% vs LHX's -69.82%.
SQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQM and LHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer