PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LHX vs. BA.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LHXBA.L
YTD Return26.21%27.37%
1Y Return45.47%27.65%
3Y Return (Ann)8.22%38.12%
5Y Return (Ann)7.70%24.22%
10Y Return (Ann)16.35%16.16%
Sharpe Ratio2.591.57
Sortino Ratio3.612.12
Omega Ratio1.461.27
Calmar Ratio1.592.74
Martin Ratio15.996.34
Ulcer Index2.93%5.02%
Daily Std Dev18.05%20.50%
Max Drawdown-65.67%-84.49%
Current Drawdown-0.95%-0.86%

Fundamentals


LHXBA.L
Market Cap$50.11B£41.98B
EPS$6.31£0.60
PE Ratio41.8723.23
PEG Ratio1.013.61
Total Revenue (TTM)$21.14B£24.56B
Gross Profit (TTM)$5.14B£2.19B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.21B£3.26B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between LHX and BA.L is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LHX vs. BA.L - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LHX having a 26.21% return and BA.L slightly higher at 27.37%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LHX having a 16.35% annualized return and BA.L not far behind at 16.16%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
19.56%
4.43%
LHX
BA.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LHX vs. BA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LHX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LHX, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LHX, currently valued at 3.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LHX, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.43
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LHX, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LHX, currently valued at 14.49, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.49
BA.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.73
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 3.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 7.97, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.97

LHX vs. BA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the BA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHX and BA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.37
1.73
LHX
BA.L

Dividends

LHX vs. BA.L - Dividend Comparison

LHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than BA.L's 2.24% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
1.77%2.17%2.15%1.91%1.80%1.45%1.86%1.55%2.01%2.23%2.48%2.26%
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
2.24%2.53%2.99%4.40%7.57%4.00%4.79%3.75%3.57%4.14%4.30%4.53%

Drawdowns

LHX vs. BA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHX drawdown since its inception was -65.67%, smaller than the maximum BA.L drawdown of -84.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHX and BA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.95%
-1.88%
LHX
BA.L

Volatility

LHX vs. BA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) is 6.24%, while BAE Systems plc (BA.L) has a volatility of 8.09%. This indicates that LHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.24%
8.09%
LHX
BA.L

Financials

LHX vs. BA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between L3Harris Technologies, Inc. and BAE Systems plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. LHX values in USD, BA.L values in GBp