PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQM vs. BLBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SQM vs. BLBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQM achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly lower than BLBD's 57.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SQM has underperformed BLBD with an annualized return of 17.26%, while BLBD has yielded a comparatively higher 20.45% annualized return.


SQM

1D
-3.98%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
17.15%
6M
17.42%
1Y
143.85%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
18.26%
10Y*
17.26%

BLBD

1D
0.87%
1M
13.31%
YTD
57.43%
6M
43.06%
1Y
76.84%
3Y*
49.42%
5Y*
23.17%
10Y*
20.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQM vs. BLBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
17.15%89.55%-39.35%-18.47%71.62%6.82%89.19%-27.30%-32.71%115.00%
BLBD
Blue Bird Corporation
57.43%21.67%43.29%151.73%-31.52%-14.35%-20.33%26.00%-8.59%28.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SQM and BLBD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2014

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SQM:

$22.71B

BLBD:

$2.41B

EPS

SQM:

$2.86

BLBD:

$4.07

PE Ratio

SQM:

27.84

BLBD:

18.16

PEG Ratio

SQM:

0.16

BLBD:

0.17

PS Ratio

SQM:

4.28

BLBD:

1.62

PB Ratio

SQM:

3.88

BLBD:

8.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

SQM:

$5.31B

BLBD:

$1.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SQM:

$1.83B

BLBD:

$314.22M

EBITDA (TTM)

SQM:

$1.75B

BLBD:

$181.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQM vs. BLBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQM
SQM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQM Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BLBD
BLBD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BLBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLBD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BLBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLBD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQM vs. BLBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SQMBLBDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.26

3.29

+2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.34

7.42

+9.92

SQM vs. BLBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQM Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the BLBD Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQM and BLBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SQM vs. BLBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQM drawdown since its inception was -78.34%, which is greater than BLBD's maximum drawdown of -74.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQM and BLBD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQMBLBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.34%

-74.16%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.11%

-23.45%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.32%

-45.95%

-15.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.76%

-73.24%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.98%

-74.16%

+1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.71%

0.00%

-18.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.31%

-20.56%

-9.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.33%

10.39%

-2.06%

Volatility

SQM vs. BLBD - Volatility Comparison

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a higher volatility of 14.57% compared to Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) at 10.43%. This indicates that SQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQMBLBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.57%

10.43%

+4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.45%

31.64%

+4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.44%

42.87%

+8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.85%

56.70%

-6.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.14%

51.30%

-5.16%

Dividends

SQM vs. BLBD - Dividend Comparison

SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while BLBD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLBD
Blue Bird Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
1.45%0.18%0.59%8.34%9.66%3.92%1.64%4.55%5.37%2.73%4.77%2.00%

Financials

SQM vs. BLBD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. and Blue Bird Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
1.76B
352.64M
(SQM) Total Revenue
(BLBD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SQM vs. BLBD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. and Blue Bird Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
44.2%
20.0%
Portfolio components
SQM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 778.60M and revenue of 1.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

BLBD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a gross profit of 70.65M and revenue of 352.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

SQM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 729.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.

BLBD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported an operating income of 39.12M and revenue of 352.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

SQM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a net income of 364.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.

BLBD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a net income of 29.30M and revenue of 352.64M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SQM and BLBD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQM has higher volatility (14.57%) compared to BLBD (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQM dropped -78.34% vs BLBD's -74.16%.

SQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQM and BLBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer