SQLV vs. DBC
SQLV (Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SQLV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. SQLV is actively managed, while DBC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SQLV returned 8.37%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for DBC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SQLV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
SQLV vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQLV achieves a 22.70% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 26.70% return.
SQLV
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- 6M
- 17.76%
- YTD
- 22.70%
- 1Y
- 29.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 22.16%
- YTD
- 26.70%
- 1Y
- 30.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
SQLV vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF | 22.70% | 2.50% | 4.76% | 21.21% | -12.86% | 37.14% | 7.13% | 17.41% | -10.55% | 8.84% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 26.70% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 15.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQLV and DBC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SQLV and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQLV vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
SQLV
DBC
SQLV vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQLV | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 1.83 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 6.41 | +3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQLV vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQLV drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQLV and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQLV | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.34% | -76.36% | +28.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.84% | -16.54% | +7.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.86% | -16.54% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.86% | -27.34% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -26.71% | +26.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -46.13% | +37.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 4.71% | -1.80% |
Volatility
SQLV vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) is 4.42%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that SQLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQLV | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 6.07% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 16.67% | -4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.58% | 18.84% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 19.28% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 17.80% | +5.48% |
SQLV vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQLV vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
SQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than DBC's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.63% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% |
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF | 0.96% | 1.15% | 1.11% | 1.09% | 1.24% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.20% | 1.08% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQLV and DBC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to SQLV (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQLV dropped -48.34% vs DBC's -76.36%.
On 5-year performance, DBC leads with 11.23% vs 8.37% for SQLV. On fees, SQLV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SQLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBC has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SQLV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.96% for SQLV.
SQLV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SQLV and 0.85% for DBC.
SQLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQLV and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer