PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYV vs. PDBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYV vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 11.80% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has outperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 11.93%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.61% annualized return.


SPYV

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.86%
6M
7.31%
YTD
11.80%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
11.93%
ALL TIME*
7.92%

PDBC

1D
0.47%
1M
5.47%
6M
18.25%
YTD
28.15%
1Y
35.58%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*
8.61%
ALL TIME*
3.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$121.86M$152.61M$122.20M
$164.00M$137.60M$152.34M

SPYV vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
11.80%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
28.15%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%41.72%-7.84%11.44%-12.78%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYV and PDBC is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014

0.28

The correlation between SPYV and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYV vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPYV vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYVPDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.31

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

2.16

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

7.07

+6.75

SPYV vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYV and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYV vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and PDBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYVPDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

-49.52%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-16.55%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-16.55%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

-27.63%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

-40.73%

+3.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-10.21%

+10.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-23.02%

+14.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

5.05%

-3.45%

Volatility

SPYV vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.78%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYVPDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

7.58%

-4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.20%

16.65%

-9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.88%

19.73%

-9.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

19.28%

-4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

17.85%

-0.97%

SPYV vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYV vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than PDBC's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
3.00%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%0.00%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.66%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYV and PDBC have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBC has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to SPYV (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 11.93% vs 8.61% for PDBC. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.

PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.66% for SPYV.

SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYV and 0.58% for PDBC.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYV and PDBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer