SPYQ vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SPYQ (Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYQ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. SPYQ is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past year, SPYQ returned 51.99% vs 27.05% for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

SPYQ vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYQ achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.74% return.

SPYQ

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 9.36%
• YTD: 18.82%
• 6M: 18.88%
• 1Y: 51.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 7.74%
• 6M: 7.31%
• 1Y: 27.05%
• 3Y*: 25.53%
• 5Y*: 16.21%
• 10Y*: 18.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYQ vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SPYQ Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF	18.82%	26.22%	4.76%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	7.74%	17.50%	8.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYQ and SCHG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024	0.93

The correlation between SPYQ and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPYQ vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYQ

SPYQ Risk / Return Rank: 62
SPYQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SPYQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SPYQ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SPYQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SPYQ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 43
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYQ vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYQ	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.76	+0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.37	+0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.31	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	1.70	+1.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.80	5.70	+7.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPYQ vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYQ and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYQ	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	1.76	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.85	+0.06

Drawdowns

SPYQ vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYQ drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYQ and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYQ	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.88%	-34.59%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.70%	-16.41%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.57%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-5.20%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	4.90%	-0.74%

Volatility

SPYQ vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.31%. This indicates that SPYQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYQ	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.11%	3.31%	+1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.07%	11.56%	+6.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.73%	15.45%	+8.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.64%	22.27%	+12.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.64%	21.55%	+13.09%

SPYQ vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYQ vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SPYQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SCHG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
SPYQ Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF	0.14%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYQ and SCHG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SPYQ and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPYQ or SCHG?

SPYQ has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to SCHG (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYQ dropped -35.88% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, SPYQ or SCHG?

On 1-year performance, SPYQ leads with 51.99% vs 27.05% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYQ or SCHG?

Over the 1-year period, SPYQ has performed better with a 51.99% return vs 27.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYQ or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SPYQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYQ or SCHG?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.14% for SPYQ.

What is the main difference between SPYQ and SCHG?

SPYQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SPYQ and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.