SPYM vs. XLU
SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYM returned 15.62%/yr vs 9.15%/yr for XLU. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPYM charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.
Performance
SPYM vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 15.62%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.15% annualized return.
SPYM
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 28.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.62%
XLU
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 9.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
SPYM vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 10.98% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.11% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYM and XLU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPYM and XLU has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPYM vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYM
XLU
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPYM
XLU
-
Financial Services
SPYM
XLU
-
Communication Services
SPYM
XLU
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPYM
XLU
-
Healthcare
SPYM
XLU
-
Industrials
SPYM
XLU
-
Consumer Defensive
SPYM
XLU
-
Energy
SPYM
XLU
-
Utilities
SPYM
XLU
Real Estate
SPYM
XLU
-
Basic Materials
SPYM
XLU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYM vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
SPYM
XLU
SPYM vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYM | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 0.63 | +1.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.27 | 0.94 | +2.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.12 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 1.00 | +2.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.76 | 2.24 | +12.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYM | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 0.63 | +1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.54 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.48 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.40 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
SPYM vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, roughly equal to the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYM | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.46% | -51.98% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -9.18% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -17.26% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.48% | -25.26% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -36.07% | +2.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -7.78% | +7.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -10.22% | +3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 4.09% | -2.18% |
Volatility
SPYM vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 2.83%, while State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYM | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 5.41% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 11.53% | -2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 14.57% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 17.32% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 19.26% | -1.26% |
SPYM vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYM vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than XLU's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.72% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYM and XLU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs XLU's -51.98%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 9.15% for XLU. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLU.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.
SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while XLU is Utilities Equities. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.08% for XLU.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYM and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer