SPYM vs. XLP
SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYM returned 15.52%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for XLP. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYM charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
SPYM vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 15.52%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.
SPYM
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.52%
XLP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
SPYM vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 9.10% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 11.10% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYM and XLP is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPYM and XLP has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPYM vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYM
XLP
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPYM
XLP
-
Financial Services
SPYM
XLP
-
Communication Services
SPYM
XLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPYM
XLP
Healthcare
SPYM
XLP
-
Industrials
SPYM
XLP
-
Consumer Defensive
SPYM
XLP
Energy
SPYM
XLP
-
Utilities
SPYM
XLP
-
Real Estate
SPYM
XLP
-
Basic Materials
SPYM
XLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYM vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
SPYM
XLP
SPYM vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYM | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.11 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 0.79 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 1.52 | +10.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYM vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYM | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.46% | -35.90% | -18.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -9.69% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -12.39% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.48% | -16.30% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -24.51% | -9.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -4.12% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -7.06% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 5.01% | -3.04% |
Volatility
SPYM vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYM | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 4.53% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 10.14% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 12.90% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 13.34% | +3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 14.75% | +3.28% |
SPYM vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYM vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than XLP's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.29% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYM and XLP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLP has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to SPYM (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs XLP's -35.90%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.52% vs 7.60% for XLP. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.52% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLP.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.29% for SPYM.
SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.08% for XLP.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYM and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer