SPYM vs. SCHF
SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYM returned 15.36%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for SCHF. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYM charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
SPYM vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 15.36%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.
SPYM
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 24.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
SPYM vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.42% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 12.60% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYM and SCHF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SPYM and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYM vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYM
SCHF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPYM
SCHF
Financial Services
SPYM
SCHF
Communication Services
SPYM
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
SPYM
SCHF
Healthcare
SPYM
SCHF
Industrials
SPYM
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
SPYM
SCHF
Energy
SPYM
SCHF
Utilities
SPYM
SCHF
Real Estate
SPYM
SCHF
Basic Materials
SPYM
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYM vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
SPYM
SCHF
SPYM vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 2.46 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 9.48 | +3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 1.74 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.57 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.60 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.43 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
SPYM vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.46% | -34.87% | -19.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -11.48% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -13.41% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.48% | -29.14% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -34.87% | +1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -3.39% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -7.37% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.98% | -1.05% |
Volatility
SPYM vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 3.64%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 5.84% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 13.94% | -4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 16.21% | -4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 16.47% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 17.20% | +0.82% |
SPYM vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYM vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SCHF's 3.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.04% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYM and SCHF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to SPYM (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.36% vs 10.24% for SCHF. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.02% for SPYM.
SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.06% for SCHF.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYM and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer