SPYM vs. RSPG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) and RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYM returned 15.62%/yr vs 9.73%/yr for RSPG. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYM charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPG.

Performance

SPYM vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 34.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed RSPG with an annualized return of 15.62%, while RSPG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.73% annualized return.

SPYM

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 5.06%
• YTD: 10.98%
• 6M: 10.98%
• 1Y: 28.09%
• 3Y*: 22.46%
• 5Y*: 13.91%
• 10Y*: 15.62%

RSPG

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: 34.27%
• 6M: 28.95%
• 1Y: 47.49%
• 3Y*: 19.93%
• 5Y*: 21.10%
• 10Y*: 9.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	10.98%	17.79%	25.00%	26.24%	-18.09%	28.78%	18.49%	31.99%	-4.78%	21.30%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	34.27%	7.01%	6.09%	4.49%	57.97%	57.73%	-32.44%	13.38%	-24.68%	-6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and RSPG is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006	0.51

The correlation between SPYM and RSPG shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYM vs. RSPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPYM	RSPG
Technology	38.5%	-
Financial Services	11.1%	0.0%
Communication Services	10.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	-
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	7.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	-
Energy	3.2%	100.0%
Utilities	2.5%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

SPYM vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM

SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

RSPG

RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 64
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYM	RSPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.20	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	2.80	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.35	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.92	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.76	11.59	+3.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPYM vs. RSPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the RSPG Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and RSPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYM	RSPG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	2.20	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.75	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87	0.29	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.18	+0.44

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and RSPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYM	RSPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.46%	-79.98%	+25.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-12.18%	+3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.72%	-23.06%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.48%	-28.44%	+3.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.87%	-73.17%	+39.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-5.67%	+5.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-25.47%	+18.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	4.11%	-2.20%

Volatility

SPYM vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 2.83%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYM	RSPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	8.19%	-5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.90%	16.77%	-7.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.80%	21.69%	-9.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	28.31%	-11.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.00%	33.57%	-15.57%

SPYM vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYM vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than RSPG's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	1.94%	2.60%	2.43%	2.84%	3.43%	2.37%	3.15%	2.15%	2.18%	2.55%	1.14%	2.80%
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	1.00%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.79%	2.23%	1.75%	1.97%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYM and RSPG in my portfolio?

SPYM and RSPG have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPYM or RSPG?

RSPG has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs RSPG's -79.98%.

Which ETF is better, SPYM or RSPG?

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 9.73% for RSPG. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYM or RSPG?

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 9.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYM or RSPG?

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYM or RSPG?

RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.

What is the main difference between SPYM and RSPG?

SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPG is Energy Equities. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.40% for RSPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.