SPYI vs. QYLD
SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. SPYI is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPYI returned 16.41%/yr vs 13.80%/yr for QYLD. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
SPYI vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPYI having a 7.72% return and QYLD slightly higher at 7.88%.
SPYI
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
SPYI vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 7.72% | 16.67% | 19.03% | 18.09% | -2.44% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -3.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYI and QYLD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SPYI and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYI vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYI
QYLD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPYI
QYLD
Financial Services
SPYI
QYLD
Communication Services
SPYI
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
SPYI
QYLD
Healthcare
SPYI
QYLD
Industrials
SPYI
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
SPYI
QYLD
Energy
SPYI
QYLD
Utilities
SPYI
QYLD
Real Estate
SPYI
QYLD
Basic Materials
SPYI
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYI vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
SPYI
QYLD
SPYI vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.63 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 4.84 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.43 | 28.36 | -12.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.80 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.59 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
SPYI vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYI drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYI and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -24.75% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.72% | -4.97% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.47% | -19.06% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.06% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -3.84% | +2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 0.85% | +0.63% |
Volatility
SPYI vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) have volatilities of 1.82% and 1.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 1.85% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.41% | 7.12% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.63% | 8.58% | +1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 14.70% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 15.49% | -2.57% |
SPYI vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYI vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
SPYI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.64%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 11.64% | 11.70% | 12.04% | 12.01% | 4.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYI and QYLD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLD has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to SPYI (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYI dropped -16.47% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 3-year performance, SPYI leads with 16.41% vs 13.80% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPYI has performed better with a 16.41% return vs 13.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYI.
SPYI has the higher dividend yield at 11.64%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.
SPYI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYI and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYI and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer