SPYH vs. QQHG
SPYH (NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and QQHG (Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPYH returned 18.78% vs 26.43% for QQHG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYH charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQHG.
Performance
SPYH vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's 11.43% return.
SPYH
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 18.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQHG
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYH vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 5.74% | 17.14% |
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 11.43% | 20.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYH and QQHG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SPYH and QQHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYH vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank
SPYH
QQHG
SPYH vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYH | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 2.82 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.35 | 3.92 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.51 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 4.30 | -1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 17.07 | -1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYH | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.82 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.93 | 3.35 | -1.42 |
Drawdowns
SPYH vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -6.39%, roughly equal to the maximum QQHG drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and QQHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYH | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.39% | -6.18% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.02% | -6.18% | +0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.26% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -0.97% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 1.55% | -0.31% |
Volatility
SPYH vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) is 1.55%, while Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that SPYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYH | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 2.12% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 6.66% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 9.47% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 9.53% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 9.53% | +2.83% |
SPYH vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYH vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison
SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than QQHG's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 0.20% | 0.17% |
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 7.54% | 5.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SPYH and QQHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQHG has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to SPYH (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -6.39% vs QQHG's -6.18%.
On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 26.43% vs 18.78% for SPYH. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 26.43% return vs 18.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.
SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.
They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.45% for QQHG.
QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYH and QQHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer