PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYH vs. QQHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYH vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's 11.43% return.


SPYH

1D
-0.39%
1M
3.32%
YTD
5.74%
6M
6.16%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQHG

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.73%
YTD
11.43%
6M
10.75%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYH vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYH and QQHG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.90

The correlation between SPYH and QQHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYH vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYH vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYHQQHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.82

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

3.92

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

4.30

-1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.14

17.07

-1.93

SPYH vs. QQHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYH Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the QQHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYH and QQHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYHQQHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.82

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.93

3.35

-1.42

Drawdowns

SPYH vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -6.39%, roughly equal to the maximum QQHG drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and QQHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYHQQHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-6.18%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-6.18%

+0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.26%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-0.97%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.55%

-0.31%

Volatility

SPYH vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) is 1.55%, while Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that SPYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYHQQHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

2.12%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

6.66%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.80%

9.47%

-1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.36%

9.53%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.36%

9.53%

+2.83%

SPYH vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYH vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison

SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than QQHG's 0.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SPYH and QQHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQHG has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to SPYH (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -6.39% vs QQHG's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 26.43% vs 18.78% for SPYH. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 26.43% return vs 18.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.

They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.45% for QQHG.

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYH and QQHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer