QQHG vs. SHLD
QQHG (Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF) and SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQHG is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Invesco, while SHLD is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Defense Tech Index. QQHG is actively managed, while SHLD is passively managed. Over the past year, QQHG returned 26.43% vs 9.71% for SHLD. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQHG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SHLD.
Performance
QQHG vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.28% return.
QQHG
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHLD
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- -2.28%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQHG vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 11.43% | 20.59% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | -2.28% | 22.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQHG and SHLD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQHG vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank
QQHG
SHLD
QQHG vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQHG | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.82 | 0.41 | +2.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 0.74 | +3.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.08 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | 0.49 | +3.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.07 | 1.30 | +15.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQHG | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 0.41 | +2.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.35 | 2.00 | +1.35 |
Drawdowns
QQHG vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and SHLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQHG | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -20.10% | +13.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | -20.10% | +13.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -18.85% | +18.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -3.19% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 7.51% | -5.96% |
Volatility
QQHG vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) is 2.12%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that QQHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQHG | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 7.81% | -5.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | 19.35% | -12.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.47% | 24.05% | -14.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.53% | 21.13% | -11.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.53% | 21.13% | -11.60% |
QQHG vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQHG vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison
QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than SHLD's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 0.20% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQHG and SHLD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHLD has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to QQHG (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQHG dropped -6.18% vs SHLD's -20.10%.
On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 26.43% vs 9.71% for SHLD. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, QQHG has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 26.43% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHLD.
SHLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.
QQHG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQHG and 0.50% for SHLD.
QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQHG and SHLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer