PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQHG vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQHG vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -6.76% return.


QQHG

1D
0.65%
1M
0.54%
6M
8.51%
YTD
10.02%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-0.41%
1M
-5.34%
6M
-20.90%
YTD
-6.76%
1Y
-0.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQHG vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
10.02%20.59%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-6.76%23.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QQHG and SHLD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQHG vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQHG vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQHGSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.01

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

-0.04

+3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.41

-0.10

+12.50

QQHG vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQHG and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQHG vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQHGSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-25.40%

+19.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-25.40%

+19.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-22.57%

+21.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.05%

-3.85%

+2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

10.09%

-8.40%

Volatility

QQHG vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) is 4.03%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 8.48%. This indicates that QQHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQHGSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

8.48%

-4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

19.87%

-11.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

25.18%

-14.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.20%

21.56%

-11.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.20%

21.56%

-11.36%

QQHG vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQHG vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than SHLD's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
0.26%0.17%0.00%0.00%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.70%0.55%0.53%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQHG and SHLD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to QQHG (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQHG dropped -6.18% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 20.94% vs -0.98% for SHLD. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, QQHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 20.94% return vs -0.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHLD.

SHLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.26% for QQHG.

QQHG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQHG and 0.50% for SHLD.

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQHG and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer