PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYH vs. QGRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYH vs. QGRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly lower than QGRD's 11.09% return.


SPYH

1D
-0.47%
1M
1.28%
6M
4.42%
YTD
5.79%
1Y
14.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QGRD

1D
-1.41%
1M
-1.04%
6M
9.04%
YTD
11.09%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYH vs. QGRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYH and QGRD is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.88

The correlation between SPYH and QGRD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYH vs. QGRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRD
QGRD Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QGRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRD Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYH vs. QGRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYHQGRDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.20

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

6.67

+4.42

SPYH vs. QGRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYH Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the QGRD Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYH and QGRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYH vs. QGRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -7.22%, smaller than the maximum QGRD drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and QGRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYHQGRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-9.41%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-9.41%

+3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-3.60%

+3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-2.23%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

3.09%

-1.76%

Volatility

SPYH vs. QGRD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) is 2.77%, while Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that SPYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYHQGRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

6.71%

-3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.45%

11.61%

-5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.29%

14.66%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.24%

14.60%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.24%

14.60%

-2.36%

SPYH vs. QGRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRD's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYH vs. QGRD - Dividend Comparison

SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, more than QGRD's 1.41% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPYH and QGRD have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGRD has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to SPYH (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -7.22% vs QGRD's -9.41%.

On 1-year performance, QGRD leads with 20.58% vs 14.73% for SPYH. On fees, SPYH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QGRD has performed better with a 20.58% return vs 14.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QGRD.

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.64%, compared with 1.41% for QGRD.

They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.85% for QGRD.

SPYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYH and QGRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer