PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGRD vs. SMOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QGRD vs. SMOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD) and Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (SMOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRD achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than SMOX's 19.65% return.


QGRD

1D
0.40%
1M
-2.87%
6M
6.57%
YTD
8.03%
1Y
17.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.86%

SMOX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.17%
6M
13.12%
YTD
19.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.82M$2.43M$1.27M
$3.90M$1.99M$982.26K

QGRD vs. SMOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QGRD and SMOX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QGRD vs. SMOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QGRD
QGRD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
QGRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SMOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QGRD vs. SMOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD) and Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (SMOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QGRDSMOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

QGRD vs. SMOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QGRD vs. SMOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRD drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, which is greater than SMOX's maximum drawdown of -7.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRD and SMOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGRDSMOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-7.76%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.25%

-1.91%

-4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-1.41%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

Volatility

QGRD vs. SMOX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGRDSMOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.15%

15.03%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

15.03%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

15.03%

-0.28%

QGRD vs. SMOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SMOX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QGRD vs. SMOX - Dividend Comparison

QGRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than SMOX's 0.07% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QGRD and SMOX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMOX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMOX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QGRD.

QGRD has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.07% for SMOX.

QGRD is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SMOX is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QGRD and 0.75% for SMOX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGRD and SMOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer