PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYH vs. HECO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYH vs. HECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly lower than HECO's 71.77% return.


SPYH

1D
-0.39%
1M
3.32%
YTD
5.74%
6M
6.16%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HECO

1D
-0.95%
1M
33.22%
YTD
71.77%
6M
57.04%
1Y
136.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYH vs. HECO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYH and HECO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.69

The correlation between SPYH and HECO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYH vs. HECO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYH
HECO

Technology

35.5%
48.3%

Financial Services

12.0%
45.1%

Communication Services

11.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.8%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

SPYH
35.5%
HECO
48.3%

Financial Services

SPYH
12.0%
HECO
45.1%

Communication Services

SPYH
11.4%
HECO

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYH
9.9%
HECO

-

Healthcare

SPYH
8.4%
HECO

-

Industrials

SPYH
7.8%
HECO
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPYH
5.1%
HECO

-

Energy

SPYH
3.6%
HECO

-

Utilities

SPYH
2.5%
HECO

-

Real Estate

SPYH
2.0%
HECO

-

Basic Materials

SPYH
1.7%
HECO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYH vs. HECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

HECO
HECO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HECO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HECO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYH vs. HECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYHHECODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

3.68

-1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

4.07

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

6.52

-3.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.14

18.71

-3.57

SPYH vs. HECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYH Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is lower than the HECO Sharpe Ratio of 3.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYH and HECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYHHECODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

3.68

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.93

1.80

+0.13

Drawdowns

SPYH vs. HECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -6.39%, smaller than the maximum HECO drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and HECO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYHHECODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-44.59%

+38.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-21.03%

+15.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.18%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-11.81%

+11.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

7.31%

-6.07%

Volatility

SPYH vs. HECO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) is 1.55%, while State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that SPYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYHHECODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

10.30%

-8.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

29.36%

-23.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.80%

37.32%

-29.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.36%

44.93%

-32.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.36%

44.93%

-32.57%

SPYH vs. HECO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than HECO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYH vs. HECO - Dividend Comparison

SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, while HECO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPYH and HECO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HECO has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to SPYH (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -6.39% vs HECO's -44.59%.

On 1-year performance, HECO leads with 136.32% vs 18.78% for SPYH. On fees, SPYH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HECO has performed better with a 136.32% return vs 18.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for HECO.

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 0.00% for HECO.

SPYH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while HECO is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: NEOS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.90% for HECO.

HECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYH and HECO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer