HECO vs. QBF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HECO (State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) and QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) are both Blockchain funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HECO returned 136.32% vs -35.86% for QBF. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HECO charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBF.

Performance

HECO vs. QBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) and Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HECO achieves a 71.77% return, which is significantly higher than QBF's -23.63% return.

HECO

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 33.22%
• YTD: 71.77%
• 6M: 57.04%
• 1Y: 136.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QBF

• 1D: -2.17%
• 1M: -14.35%
• YTD: -23.63%
• 6M: -27.96%
• 1Y: -35.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HECO vs. QBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	71.77%	12.36%
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly	-23.63%	-14.22%

Correlation

The correlation between HECO and QBF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025	0.62

The correlation between HECO and QBF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HECO vs. QBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HECO

HECO Risk / Return Rank: 89
HECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
HECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
HECO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
HECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
HECO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

QBF

QBF Risk / Return Rank: 1
QBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
QBF Omega Ratio Rank: 1
QBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
QBF Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HECO vs. QBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) and Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HECO	QBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.68	-1.37	+5.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.07	-2.04	+6.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	0.78	+0.73
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.52	-0.84	+7.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.71	-1.48	+20.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HECO vs. QBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is higher than the QBF Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HECO and QBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HECO	QBF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.68	-1.37	+5.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.80	-0.97	+2.76

Drawdowns

HECO vs. QBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HECO drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, roughly equal to the maximum QBF drawdown of -42.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HECO and QBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	HECO	QBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.59%	-42.92%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.03%	-42.92%	+21.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-42.92%	+41.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.81%	-16.82%	+5.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.31%	24.20%	-16.89%

Volatility

HECO vs. QBF - Volatility Comparison

State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) has a higher volatility of 10.30% compared to Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) at 7.09%. This indicates that HECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HECO	QBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.30%	7.09%	+3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.36%	18.56%	+10.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.32%	26.36%	+10.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.93%	28.53%	+16.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.93%	28.53%	+16.40%

HECO vs. QBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

HECO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QBF's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

HECO vs. QBF - Dividend Comparison

HECO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.61%
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly	1.81%	1.38%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HECO and QBF in my portfolio?

HECO and QBF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HECO or QBF?

HECO has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to QBF (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HECO dropped -44.59% vs QBF's -42.92%.

Which ETF is better, HECO or QBF?

On 1-year performance, HECO leads with 136.32% vs -35.86% for QBF. On fees, QBF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QBF has been the lower-risk option at 7.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HECO or QBF?

Over the 1-year period, HECO has performed better with a 136.32% return vs -35.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HECO or QBF?

QBF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for HECO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HECO or QBF?

QBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for HECO.

What is the main difference between HECO and QBF?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for HECO and 0.79% for QBF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.