PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYH vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYH vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.


SPYH

1D
-0.39%
1M
3.32%
YTD
5.74%
6M
6.16%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYH vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYH and COMT is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

-0.11

SPYH vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYH
COMT

Technology

35.5%

-

Financial Services

12.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

11.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

SPYH
35.5%
COMT

-

Financial Services

SPYH
12.0%
COMT
100.0%

Communication Services

SPYH
11.4%
COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYH
9.9%
COMT

-

Healthcare

SPYH
8.4%
COMT

-

Industrials

SPYH
7.8%
COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYH
5.1%
COMT

-

Energy

SPYH
3.6%
COMT

-

Utilities

SPYH
2.5%
COMT

-

Real Estate

SPYH
2.0%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

SPYH
1.7%
COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYH vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYH vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYHCOMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.24

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

2.88

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

5.95

-2.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.14

14.11

+1.04

SPYH vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYH Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYH and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYHCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.24

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.93

0.20

+1.72

Drawdowns

SPYH vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -6.39%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYHCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-51.89%

+45.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-8.02%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-4.82%

+4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-24.07%

+23.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

3.38%

-2.14%

Volatility

SPYH vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) is 1.55%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that SPYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYHCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

7.37%

-5.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

18.80%

-13.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.80%

21.29%

-13.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.36%

21.06%

-8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.36%

18.89%

-6.53%

SPYH vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYH vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than COMT's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
SPYH
NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF
7.54%5.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYH and COMT have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to SPYH (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -6.39% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 18.78% for SPYH. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 18.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 5.54% for COMT.

SPYH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: NEOS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.48% for COMT.

SPYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYH and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer