SPYH vs. AAA
SPYH (NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and AAA (AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYH is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by NEOS, while AAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Alternative Access Funds LLC. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPYH returned 18.78% vs 5.39% for AAA. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPYH charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AAA.
Performance
SPYH vs. AAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly higher than AAA's 1.86% return.
SPYH
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 18.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAA
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 5.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYH vs. AAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 5.74% | 21.09% |
AAA AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF | 1.86% | 4.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYH and AAA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYH vs. AAA — Risk / Return Rank
SPYH
AAA
SPYH vs. AAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYH | AAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 2.36 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.35 | 4.06 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 8.98 | -5.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 27.78 | -12.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYH | AAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.36 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.93 | 1.93 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
SPYH vs. AAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -6.39%, which is greater than AAA's maximum drawdown of -2.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and AAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYH | AAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.39% | -2.63% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.02% | -0.60% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.22% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -0.30% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 0.19% | +1.05% |
Volatility
SPYH vs. AAA - Volatility Comparison
NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) at 0.74%. This indicates that SPYH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYH | AAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 0.74% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 1.76% | +4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 2.30% | +5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 2.28% | +10.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 2.15% | +10.21% |
SPYH vs. AAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than AAA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYH vs. AAA - Dividend Comparison
SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than AAA's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAA AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF | 4.90% | 5.11% | 6.17% | 6.11% | 2.78% | 1.06% | 0.32% |
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 7.54% | 5.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYH and AAA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYH has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to AAA (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -6.39% vs AAA's -2.63%.
On 1-year performance, SPYH leads with 18.78% vs 5.39% for AAA. On fees, AAA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPYH has performed better with a 18.78% return vs 5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.
SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 4.90% for AAA.
SPYH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while AAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Alternative Access Funds LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.25% for AAA.
SPYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYH and AAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer