AAA vs. AAAU
Compare and contrast key facts about AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU).
AAA and AAAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AAA is an actively managed fund by Alternative Access Funds LLC. It was launched on Sep 9, 2020. AAAU is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jul 26, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AAA or AAAU.
Key characteristics
| AAA | AAAU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.57% | 11.50% |
| 1Y Return | 8.91% | 12.11% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.06% | 8.81% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 5.17 | 1.06 |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.72% | 12.21% |
| Max Drawdown | -2.64% | -21.63% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAA and AAAU is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AAA vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AAA achieves a 2.57% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 11.50% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAA vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AAA vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AAA vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
AAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAA AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF | 6.21% | 6.11% | 2.78% | 1.05% | 0.32% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AAA vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAA drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum AAAU drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAA and AAAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AAA vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) is 0.39%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that AAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.