PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. VHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -4.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 18.20%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.26% annualized return.


SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%

VHT

1D
0.84%
1M
1.45%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-4.02%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and VHT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between SPYG and VHT has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPYG vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
VHT

Technology

51.9%
0.0%

Communication Services

16.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%

-

Financial Services

8.5%
0.0%

Healthcare

5.8%
100.0%

Industrials

5.0%
0.0%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.0%

-

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Technology

SPYG
51.9%
VHT
0.0%

Communication Services

SPYG
16.8%
VHT

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.9%
VHT

-

Financial Services

SPYG
8.5%
VHT
0.0%

Healthcare

SPYG
5.8%
VHT
100.0%

Industrials

SPYG
5.0%
VHT
0.0%

Utilities

SPYG
1.2%
VHT

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
1.0%
VHT

-

Real Estate

SPYG
0.6%
VHT

-

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
VHT

-

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
VHT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYGVHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.18

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.38

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

3.47

+6.78

SPYG vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and VHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYGVHTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.00

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.30

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.55

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.56

-0.20

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and VHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGVHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-39.12%

-28.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-10.40%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-16.91%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-17.71%

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-28.85%

-3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-7.05%

+5.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.33%

-5.99%

-18.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

4.14%

-0.82%

Volatility

SPYG vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.08%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGVHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

4.08%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

10.08%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

14.34%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

14.96%

+6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

16.94%

+3.70%

SPYG vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYG vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than VHT's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.71%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYG and VHT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to VHT (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs VHT's -39.12%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.20% vs 9.26% for VHT. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VHT.

VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.09% for VHT.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and VHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer