SPYG vs. SSO
SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYG returned 17.91%/yr vs 24.02%/yr for SSO. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
SPYG vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 15.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 17.91%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.02% annualized return.
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 17.91%
SSO
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 15.08%
- 6M
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 47.12%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.57%
- 10Y*
- 24.02%
SPYG vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 15.08% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYG and SSO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SPYG and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYG vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYG
SSO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYG
SSO
Communication Services
SPYG
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
SPYG
SSO
Financial Services
SPYG
SSO
Healthcare
SPYG
SSO
Industrials
SPYG
SSO
Utilities
SPYG
SSO
Consumer Defensive
SPYG
SSO
Real Estate
SPYG
SSO
Basic Materials
SPYG
SSO
Energy
SPYG
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYG vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
SPYG
SSO
SPYG vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 2.42 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 10.37 | -2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYG vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.63% | -84.67% | +17.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -18.17% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -35.21% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.67% | -46.73% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.67% | -59.34% | +26.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -4.94% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -19.55% | -4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 4.24% | -0.82% |
Volatility
SPYG vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 6.33%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 8.74%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 8.74% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 19.17% | -5.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 24.54% | -7.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 33.78% | -12.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 35.95% | -15.25% |
SPYG vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYG vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SSO's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.64% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SPYG and SSO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SSO has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to SPYG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.02% vs 17.91% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.02% return vs 17.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.
SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SSO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYG and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer