PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. SPMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than SPMD's 15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed SPMD with an annualized return of 17.91%, while SPMD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.78% annualized return.


SPYG

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
17.91%

SPMD

1D
0.73%
1M
3.56%
YTD
15.51%
6M
14.03%
1Y
27.96%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
15.51%7.44%13.91%16.48%-13.13%24.76%13.46%25.19%-10.34%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and SPMD is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.77

The correlation between SPYG and SPMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMD
SPMD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYGSPMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.95

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

10.81

-2.72

SPYG vs. SPMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SPMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and SPMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than SPMD's maximum drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and SPMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGSPMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-57.62%

-10.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-8.86%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-24.08%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-24.08%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-41.86%

+9.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

0.00%

-4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.30%

-8.11%

-16.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.41%

+1.01%

Volatility

SPYG vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) at 5.07%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGSPMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

5.07%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

11.77%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

15.91%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.27%

19.75%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

21.20%

-0.50%

SPYG vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMD's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYG vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SPMD's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
1.21%1.39%1.42%1.47%1.64%1.24%1.30%1.57%1.85%1.97%2.13%5.33%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYG and SPMD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to SPMD (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs SPMD's -57.62%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs 11.78% for SPMD. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SPMD.

SPMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while SPMD is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SPMD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.05% for SPMD.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and SPMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer