SPYG vs. PLTY

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while PLTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. SPYG is passively managed, while PLTY is actively managed. Over the past year, SPYG returned 29.17% vs -6.06% for PLTY. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTY.

Performance

SPYG vs. PLTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than PLTY's -20.95% return.

SPYG

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 10.60%
• 1Y: 29.17%
• 3Y*: 25.85%
• 5Y*: 14.92%
• 10Y*: 17.91%

PLTY

• 1D: -2.25%
• 1M: -3.05%
• YTD: -20.95%
• 6M: -23.85%
• 1Y: -6.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. PLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	9.70%	22.09%	7.44%
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF	-20.95%	78.06%	52.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and PLTY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024	0.57

The correlation between SPYG and PLTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPYG vs. PLTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 52
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PLTY

PLTY Risk / Return Rank: 9
PLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
PLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
PLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 9
PLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. PLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPYG	PLTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	-0.11	+1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	0.13	+2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.02	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	-0.14	+2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.08	-0.26	+8.35

SPYG vs. PLTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the PLTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and PLTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. PLTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than PLTY's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and PLTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYG	PLTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.63%	-36.61%	-31.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.76%	-34.41%	+20.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.65%	-31.44%	+26.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.30%	-13.01%	-11.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	18.36%	-14.94%

Volatility

SPYG vs. PLTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 6.33%, while YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYG	PLTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.33%	14.45%	-8.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.48%	32.45%	-18.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.81%	42.71%	-25.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.27%	52.62%	-31.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.70%	52.62%	-31.92%

SPYG vs. PLTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYG vs. PLTY - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than PLTY's 124.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF	124.27%	112.44%	7.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.48%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYG and PLTY in my portfolio?

SPYG and PLTY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPYG or PLTY?

PLTY has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to SPYG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs PLTY's -36.61%.

Which ETF is better, SPYG or PLTY?

On 1-year performance, SPYG leads with 29.17% vs -6.06% for PLTY. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYG or PLTY?

Over the 1-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 29.17% return vs -6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYG or PLTY?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYG or PLTY?

PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 124.27%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

What is the main difference between SPYG and PLTY?

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while PLTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: State Street and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.99% for PLTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.