PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 17.91%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.47% annualized return.


SPYG

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
17.91%

MOAT

1D
0.41%
1M
3.19%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
14.57%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.66%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and MOAT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between SPYG and MOAT has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPYG vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
MOAT

Technology

53.2%
33.8%

Communication Services

16.1%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
7.3%

Financial Services

8.4%
9.0%

Healthcare

5.8%
15.9%

Industrials

5.1%
13.8%

Utilities

1.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
17.0%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.8%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Technology

SPYG
53.2%
MOAT
33.8%

Communication Services

SPYG
16.1%
MOAT
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.5%
MOAT
7.3%

Financial Services

SPYG
8.4%
MOAT
9.0%

Healthcare

SPYG
5.8%
MOAT
15.9%

Industrials

SPYG
5.1%
MOAT
13.8%

Utilities

SPYG
1.1%
MOAT

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
0.9%
MOAT
17.0%

Real Estate

SPYG
0.5%
MOAT
0.8%

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
MOAT

-

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
MOAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYGMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.16

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.02

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

3.11

+4.98

SPYG vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-33.31%

-34.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-12.43%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-21.44%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-23.96%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-33.31%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-4.45%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.30%

-3.83%

-20.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

4.06%

-0.64%

Volatility

SPYG vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.13%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

4.13%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

9.90%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

13.93%

+2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.27%

18.20%

+3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

18.68%

+2.02%

SPYG vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYG vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than MOAT's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.36%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYG and MOAT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs 13.47% for MOAT. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.47% for MOAT.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer