SPYG vs. MOAT
SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYG returned 17.91%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for MOAT. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.
Performance
SPYG vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 17.91%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.47% annualized return.
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 17.91%
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
SPYG vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.66% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYG and MOAT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPYG and MOAT has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPYG vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYG
MOAT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
SPYG
MOAT
Communication Services
SPYG
MOAT
Consumer Cyclical
SPYG
MOAT
Financial Services
SPYG
MOAT
Healthcare
SPYG
MOAT
Industrials
SPYG
MOAT
Utilities
SPYG
MOAT
-
Consumer Defensive
SPYG
MOAT
Real Estate
SPYG
MOAT
Basic Materials
SPYG
MOAT
-
Energy
SPYG
MOAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYG vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
SPYG
MOAT
SPYG vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYG | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.16 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 1.02 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 3.11 | +4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYG vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYG | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.63% | -33.31% | -34.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -12.43% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -21.44% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.67% | -23.96% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.67% | -33.31% | +0.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -4.45% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -3.83% | -20.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 4.06% | -0.64% |
Volatility
SPYG vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.13%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYG | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 4.13% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 9.90% | +3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 13.93% | +2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 18.20% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 18.68% | +2.02% |
SPYG vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYG vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than MOAT's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYG and MOAT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs 13.47% for MOAT. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.
MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.
SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.47% for MOAT.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYG and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer