SPYD vs. XLF
SPYD (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Index, while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYD returned 8.76%/yr vs 13.68%/yr for XLF. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYD charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
SPYD vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYD achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYD has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 8.76%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.68% annualized return.
SPYD
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 11.31%
- 1Y
- 17.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
XLF
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
SPYD vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 11.52% | 4.65% | 15.34% | 3.91% | -1.17% | 32.73% | -11.64% | 21.20% | -4.89% | 12.67% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -1.10% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYD and XLF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2015 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SPYD and XLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPYD vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYD
XLF
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Real Estate
SPYD
XLF
-
Consumer Defensive
SPYD
XLF
-
Financial Services
SPYD
XLF
Utilities
SPYD
XLF
-
Energy
SPYD
XLF
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPYD
XLF
-
Healthcare
SPYD
XLF
-
Communication Services
SPYD
XLF
-
Technology
SPYD
XLF
Basic Materials
SPYD
XLF
-
Industrials
SPYD
XLF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYD vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
SPYD
XLF
SPYD vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYD | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.11 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 0.59 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 1.50 | +5.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYD vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYD drawdown since its inception was -46.42%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYD and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYD | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.42% | -82.69% | +36.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -14.79% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -15.54% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.25% | -25.81% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.42% | -42.86% | -3.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -3.96% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -20.00% | +13.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 5.78% | -3.34% |
Volatility
SPYD vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) is 3.59%, while State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that SPYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYD | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 4.12% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.02% | 11.27% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.87% | 14.64% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 18.58% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 22.18% | -2.38% |
SPYD vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYD has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYD vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
SPYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than XLF's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 5.36% | 4.52% | 4.31% | 4.66% | 5.01% | 3.68% | 4.95% | 4.42% | 4.75% | 4.63% | 4.34% | 1.13% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.82% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYD and XLF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLF has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to SPYD (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYD dropped -46.42% vs XLF's -82.69%.
On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 13.68% vs 8.76% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 13.68% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLF.
SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 1.82% for XLF.
SPYD is categorized as S&P 500, while XLF is Financials Equities. SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPYD and 0.08% for XLF.
SPYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYD and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer