SPYD vs. XLC
SPYD (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF) and XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Index, while XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPYD returned 7.64%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for XLC. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYD charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLC.
Performance
SPYD vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYD achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly higher than XLC's -4.85% return.
SPYD
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 14.21%
- 1Y
- 20.93%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
XLC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYD vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 14.73% | 4.65% | 15.34% | 3.91% | -1.17% | 32.73% | -11.64% | 21.20% | -5.13% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.85% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYD and XLC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between SPYD and XLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPYD vs. XLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYD
XLC
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
SPYD
XLC
-
Consumer Defensive
SPYD
XLC
-
Financial Services
SPYD
XLC
-
Utilities
SPYD
XLC
-
Energy
SPYD
XLC
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPYD
XLC
-
Healthcare
SPYD
XLC
-
Communication Services
SPYD
XLC
Technology
SPYD
XLC
Basic Materials
SPYD
XLC
-
Industrials
SPYD
XLC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYD vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank
SPYD
XLC
SPYD vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYD | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.12 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 0.86 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.14 | 2.73 | +5.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYD vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYD drawdown since its inception was -46.42%, roughly equal to the maximum XLC drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYD and XLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYD | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.42% | -46.65% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -10.57% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -17.97% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.25% | -46.65% | +24.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.72% | +6.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -10.58% | +4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 3.33% | -0.91% |
Volatility
SPYD vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) is 2.92%, while Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that SPYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYD | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 3.57% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 9.65% | -1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 13.28% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 20.68% | -4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 22.17% | -2.39% |
SPYD vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYD has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYD vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
SPYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than XLC's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 4.05% | 4.52% | 4.31% | 4.66% | 5.01% | 3.68% | 4.95% | 4.42% | 4.75% | 4.63% | 4.34% | 1.13% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.25% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYD and XLC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLC has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to SPYD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYD dropped -46.42% vs XLC's -46.65%.
On 5-year performance, XLC leads with 8.03% vs 7.64% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLC has performed better with a 8.03% return vs 7.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.
SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 1.25% for XLC.
SPYD is categorized as S&P 500, while XLC is Communications Equities. SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index, while XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPYD and 0.13% for XLC.
SPYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYD and XLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer