PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYD vs. SDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYD vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYD achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than SDOG's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYD has underperformed SDOG with an annualized return of 9.09%, while SDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.


SPYD

1D
1.05%
1M
5.32%
YTD
14.73%
6M
14.21%
1Y
20.93%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
9.09%

SDOG

1D
1.26%
1M
5.43%
YTD
17.13%
6M
16.28%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYD vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
14.73%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
17.13%11.12%14.70%4.19%-0.20%24.59%-0.35%24.02%-11.43%12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYD and SDOG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2015

0.93

The correlation between SPYD and SDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYD vs. SDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYD
SDOG

Real Estate

26.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

16.0%
9.5%

Financial Services

11.9%
10.6%

Utilities

11.2%
9.2%

Energy

8.5%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
16.3%

Healthcare

5.3%
9.8%

Communication Services

4.8%
8.4%

Technology

3.2%
16.2%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.5%

Industrials

2.3%
7.5%

Real Estate

SPYD
26.5%
SDOG

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYD
16.0%
SDOG
9.5%

Financial Services

SPYD
11.9%
SDOG
10.6%

Utilities

SPYD
11.2%
SDOG
9.2%

Energy

SPYD
8.5%
SDOG
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYD
7.3%
SDOG
16.3%

Healthcare

SPYD
5.3%
SDOG
9.8%

Communication Services

SPYD
4.8%
SDOG
8.4%

Technology

SPYD
3.2%
SDOG
16.2%

Basic Materials

SPYD
3.0%
SDOG
3.5%

Industrials

SPYD
2.3%
SDOG
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYD vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SDOG
SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYD vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYDSDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

4.25

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.14

13.63

-5.48

SPYD vs. SDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the SDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYD and SDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYD vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYD drawdown since its inception was -46.42%, which is greater than SDOG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYD and SDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYDSDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.42%

-43.56%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-6.24%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-16.00%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.25%

-19.84%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.42%

-43.56%

-2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-4.91%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

1.94%

+0.48%

Volatility

SPYD vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) is 2.92%, while ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that SPYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYDSDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.34%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.74%

8.02%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.70%

11.52%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

15.44%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

19.06%

+0.72%

SPYD vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYD has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SDOG's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYD vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison

SPYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than SDOG's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.26%3.68%3.86%4.29%3.87%3.62%3.63%3.37%4.03%3.27%3.32%3.61%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.05%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SPYD and SDOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SDOG has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to SPYD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYD dropped -46.42% vs SDOG's -43.56%.

On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.99% vs 9.09% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.99% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 3.26% for SDOG.

SPYD is categorized as S&P 500, while SDOG is Large Cap Value Equities. SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index, while SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPYD and 0.36% for SDOG.

SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYD and SDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer