PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYA.DE vs. ASEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYA.DE vs. ASEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (SPYA.DE) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPYA.DE is traded in EUR, while ASEA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ASEA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYA.DE achieves a 32.76% return, which is significantly higher than ASEA's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYA.DE has outperformed ASEA with an annualized return of 10.77%, while ASEA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.


SPYA.DE

1D
-1.79%
1M
7.19%
YTD
32.76%
6M
34.22%
1Y
53.92%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
10.77%

ASEA

1D
-0.39%
1M
3.04%
YTD
10.47%
6M
12.83%
1Y
23.01%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
7.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYA.DE vs. ASEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYA.DE
SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF
32.76%17.77%17.39%3.14%-16.02%1.17%15.21%21.30%-11.35%25.30%
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
10.47%5.59%17.06%1.74%11.76%12.49%-15.47%10.79%-3.24%18.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYA.DE and ASEA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2011

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYA.DE vs. ASEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYA.DE
SPYA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPYA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ASEA
ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYA.DE vs. ASEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (SPYA.DE) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYA.DEASEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.31

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

3.65

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.86

9.56

+7.31

SPYA.DE vs. ASEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the ASEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYA.DE and ASEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYA.DEASEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

1.80

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.80

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.42

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.34

+0.11

Drawdowns

SPYA.DE vs. ASEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYA.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.34%, smaller than the maximum ASEA drawdown of -39.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYA.DE and ASEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYA.DEASEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.34%

-39.65%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-6.33%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.39%

-21.08%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-21.08%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-39.65%

+5.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-1.41%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.94%

-8.55%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.41%

+0.78%

Volatility

SPYA.DE vs. ASEA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (SPYA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) at 3.05%. This indicates that SPYA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYA.DEASEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

3.05%

+5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.09%

9.88%

+6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.17%

12.86%

+6.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.38%

13.31%

+5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

16.98%

+2.21%

SPYA.DE vs. ASEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYA.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ASEA's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYA.DE vs. ASEA - Dividend Comparison

SPYA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
3.62%3.95%3.61%3.76%2.23%4.19%2.27%2.51%3.08%1.59%2.78%3.64%
SPYA.DE
SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYA.DE and ASEA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYA.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYA.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASEA.

SPYA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPYA.DE and 0.65% for ASEA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYA.DE and ASEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer