SPY vs. RZV
SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) and RZV (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while RZV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPY returned 15.42%/yr vs 11.31%/yr for RZV. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPY charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RZV.
Performance
SPY vs. RZV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPY achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than RZV's 23.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SPY has outperformed RZV with an annualized return of 15.42%, while RZV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.31% annualized return.
SPY
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- 1Y
- 25.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
RZV
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 9.61%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 20.15%
- 1Y
- 47.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
SPY vs. RZV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.07% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 23.59% | 8.65% | 5.06% | 22.97% | -6.80% | 45.95% | -3.88% | 22.29% | -19.66% | 1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPY and RZV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2006 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SPY and RZV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPY vs. RZV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPY
RZV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPY
RZV
Financial Services
SPY
RZV
Communication Services
SPY
RZV
Consumer Cyclical
SPY
RZV
Healthcare
SPY
RZV
Industrials
SPY
RZV
Consumer Defensive
SPY
RZV
Energy
SPY
RZV
Utilities
SPY
RZV
Real Estate
SPY
RZV
Basic Materials
SPY
RZV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPY vs. RZV — Risk / Return Rank
SPY
RZV
SPY vs. RZV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPY | RZV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 3.59 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.39 | 11.69 | +0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPY vs. RZV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPY drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, smaller than the maximum RZV drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY and RZV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPY | RZV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.19% | -77.11% | +21.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -12.56% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | -29.81% | +11.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.50% | -29.81% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | -60.42% | +26.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | 0.00% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.04% | -13.58% | +4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 3.85% | -1.88% |
Volatility
SPY vs. RZV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) is 4.34%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that SPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RZV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPY | RZV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 5.14% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 13.84% | -4.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 20.71% | -8.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 24.37% | -7.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 27.02% | -9.06% |
SPY vs. RZV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPY has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RZV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPY vs. RZV - Dividend Comparison
SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than RZV's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.59% | 1.14% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 0.86% | 0.63% | 1.03% | 2.03% | 1.02% | 0.46% | 1.24% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPY and RZV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RZV has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to SPY (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPY dropped -55.19% vs RZV's -77.11%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.42% vs 11.31% for RZV. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.42% return vs 11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZV.
RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.00% for SPY.
SPY is categorized as S&P 500, while RZV is Small Cap Value Equities. SPY tracks S&P 500 Index, while RZV tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY and 0.35% for RZV.
RZV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPY and RZV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer