SPY vs. QYLD
SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPY returned 15.48%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for QYLD. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPY charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
SPY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPY having a 10.09% return and QYLD slightly higher at 10.20%. Over the past 10 years, SPY has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 15.48%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.07% annualized return.
SPY
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
QYLD
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
SPY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.09% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 10.20% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPY and QYLD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SPY and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPY vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPY
QYLD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPY
QYLD
Financial Services
SPY
QYLD
Communication Services
SPY
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
SPY
QYLD
Healthcare
SPY
QYLD
Industrials
SPY
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
SPY
QYLD
Energy
SPY
QYLD
Utilities
SPY
QYLD
Real Estate
SPY
QYLD
Basic Materials
SPY
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
SPY
QYLD
SPY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.60 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 5.16 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.61 | 29.06 | -15.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPY drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.19% | -24.75% | -30.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -4.97% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | -19.06% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.50% | -24.61% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | -24.75% | -8.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | 0.00% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.04% | -3.83% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 0.88% | +1.09% |
Volatility
SPY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.30%. This indicates that SPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 4.30% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 8.24% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 9.49% | +2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 14.81% | +2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 15.54% | +2.44% |
SPY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPY has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than QYLD's 11.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.22% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to QYLD (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPY dropped -55.19% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.48% vs 10.07% for QYLD. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.48% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
SPY is categorized as S&P 500, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. SPY tracks S&P 500 Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPY and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer