PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPY vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPY having a 10.09% return and QYLD slightly higher at 10.20%. Over the past 10 years, SPY has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 15.48%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.07% annualized return.


SPY

1D
1.04%
1M
0.80%
YTD
10.09%
6M
10.30%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
14.00%
10Y*
15.48%

QYLD

1D
2.43%
1M
3.81%
YTD
10.20%
6M
10.75%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.09%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
10.20%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SPY and QYLD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.79

The correlation between SPY and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPY vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPY
QYLD

Technology

39.0%
58.7%

Financial Services

11.1%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.6%
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
11.4%

Healthcare

8.3%
3.7%

Industrials

7.8%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
6.4%

Energy

3.1%
0.5%

Utilities

2.1%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.0%

Technology

SPY
39.0%
QYLD
58.7%

Financial Services

SPY
11.1%
QYLD
0.2%

Communication Services

SPY
10.6%
QYLD
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SPY
9.9%
QYLD
11.4%

Healthcare

SPY
8.3%
QYLD
3.7%

Industrials

SPY
7.8%
QYLD
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPY
4.5%
QYLD
6.4%

Energy

SPY
3.1%
QYLD
0.5%

Utilities

SPY
2.1%
QYLD
1.2%

Real Estate

SPY
1.8%
QYLD
0.1%

Basic Materials

SPY
1.7%
QYLD
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.60

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

5.16

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.61

29.06

-15.45

SPY vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPY and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPY drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.19%

-24.75%

-30.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-4.97%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-19.06%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-24.61%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

-24.75%

-8.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

0.00%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-3.83%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

0.88%

+1.09%

Volatility

SPY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.30%. This indicates that SPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

4.30%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

8.24%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

9.49%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

14.81%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

15.54%

+2.44%

SPY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPY has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than QYLD's 11.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.22%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPY has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to QYLD (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPY dropped -55.19% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.48% vs 10.07% for QYLD. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.48% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.

SPY is categorized as S&P 500, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. SPY tracks S&P 500 Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPY and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer