SPY vs. GDXJ
SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPY returned 15.42%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPY charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
SPY vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPY achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SPY has outperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 15.42%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.00% annualized return.
SPY
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
GDXJ
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -19.14%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -6.68%
- 1Y
- 51.06%
- 3Y*
- 44.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
SPY vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.07% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -8.37% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPY and GDXJ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2009 | 0.24 |
The correlation between SPY and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (10 years) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPY vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPY
GDXJ
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SPY
GDXJ
-
Financial Services
SPY
GDXJ
-
Communication Services
SPY
GDXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPY
GDXJ
-
Healthcare
SPY
GDXJ
-
Industrials
SPY
GDXJ
-
Consumer Defensive
SPY
GDXJ
-
Energy
SPY
GDXJ
-
Utilities
SPY
GDXJ
-
Real Estate
SPY
GDXJ
-
Basic Materials
SPY
GDXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPY vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
SPY
GDXJ
SPY vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPY | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.20 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 1.30 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.39 | 3.55 | +8.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPY vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPY drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPY | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.19% | -88.66% | +33.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -39.47% | +30.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | -39.47% | +20.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.50% | -49.76% | +25.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | -57.77% | +24.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -33.25% | +30.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.04% | -60.45% | +51.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 14.41% | -12.44% |
Volatility
SPY vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) is 4.34%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 19.46%. This indicates that SPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPY | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 19.46% | -15.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 43.41% | -33.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 51.54% | -39.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 41.50% | -24.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 44.23% | -26.27% |
SPY vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPY has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPY vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than GDXJ's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.54% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPY and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to SPY (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPY dropped -55.19% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.42% vs 12.00% for GDXJ. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.42% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.00% for SPY.
SPY is categorized as S&P 500, while GDXJ is Gold. SPY tracks S&P 500 Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY and 0.52% for GDXJ.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPY and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer