PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPY vs. AOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPY vs. AOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPY achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than AOR's 5.53% return. Over the past 10 years, SPY has outperformed AOR with an annualized return of 15.16%, while AOR has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.


SPY

1D
-2.58%
1M
0.82%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.18%
1Y
24.51%
3Y*
21.43%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
15.16%

AOR

1D
-1.97%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.95%
1Y
16.76%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPY vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
8.45%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
5.53%16.44%10.68%15.75%-15.64%11.19%11.42%18.91%-5.82%15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SPY and AOR is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008

0.90

The correlation between SPY and AOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPY vs. AOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPY
AOR

Technology

35.9%
27.8%

Financial Services

11.8%
16.2%

Communication Services

11.3%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
9.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.0%

Industrials

7.8%
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.0%

Energy

3.6%
4.3%

Utilities

2.4%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.2%

Technology

SPY
35.9%
AOR
27.8%

Financial Services

SPY
11.8%
AOR
16.2%

Communication Services

SPY
11.3%
AOR
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPY
10.3%
AOR
9.5%

Healthcare

SPY
8.4%
AOR
8.0%

Industrials

SPY
7.8%
AOR
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPY
4.8%
AOR
5.0%

Energy

SPY
3.6%
AOR
4.3%

Utilities

SPY
2.4%
AOR
2.7%

Real Estate

SPY
1.9%
AOR
2.4%

Basic Materials

SPY
1.8%
AOR
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPY vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPY vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYAORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.59

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.50

11.27

+2.23

SPY vs. AOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the AOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPY and AOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYAORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.99

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.62

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.76

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.68

-0.10

Drawdowns

SPY vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPY drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, which is greater than AOR's maximum drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY and AOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYAORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.19%

-24.44%

-30.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-6.64%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-9.77%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-21.72%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

-22.95%

-10.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-2.25%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.05%

-3.47%

-5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.52%

+0.39%

Volatility

SPY vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) at 3.12%. This indicates that SPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYAORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.12%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

7.11%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

8.66%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

10.58%

+6.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

10.69%

+7.26%

SPY vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPY has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AOR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPY vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison

SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than AOR's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
2.51%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SPY and AOR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPY has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to AOR (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPY dropped -55.19% vs AOR's -24.44%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.16% vs 8.14% for AOR. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, AOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.16% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AOR.

AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.00% for SPY.

SPY is categorized as S&P 500, while AOR is Diversified Portfolio. SPY tracks S&P 500 Index, while AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY and 0.15% for AOR.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPY and AOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer