SPXV vs. XRMI
SPXV (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while XRMI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPXV returned 24.48%/yr vs 6.71%/yr for XRMI. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.
Performance
SPXV vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXV achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 1.75% return.
SPXV
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
XRMI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXV vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 12.35% | 18.40% | 28.02% | 30.71% | -20.47% | 7.00% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 1.75% | 4.60% | 15.18% | 4.22% | -14.06% | 2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXV and XRMI is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SPXV and XRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXV vs. XRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXV
XRMI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Technology
SPXV
XRMI
Financial Services
SPXV
XRMI
Communication Services
SPXV
XRMI
Consumer Cyclical
SPXV
XRMI
Industrials
SPXV
XRMI
Consumer Defensive
SPXV
XRMI
Energy
SPXV
XRMI
Utilities
SPXV
XRMI
Real Estate
SPXV
XRMI
Basic Materials
SPXV
XRMI
Healthcare
SPXV
-
XRMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXV vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank
SPXV
XRMI
SPXV vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXV | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 1.90 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 7.70 | +6.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXV | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.78 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.37 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
SPXV vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXV drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXV and XRMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXV | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.34% | -15.31% | -19.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -5.02% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.89% | -8.34% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.20% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -5.94% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.23% | +0.84% |
Volatility
SPXV vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 0.89%. This indicates that SPXV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXV | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 0.89% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 4.21% | +5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 5.39% | +7.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 6.91% | +10.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 6.91% | +11.10% |
SPXV vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXV vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison
SPXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than XRMI's 12.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 0.89% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.67% | 1.11% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.89% | 1.57% | 2.66% | 0.56% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.62% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXV and XRMI have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXV has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to XRMI (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXV dropped -34.34% vs XRMI's -15.31%.
On 3-year performance, SPXV leads with 24.48% vs 6.71% for XRMI. On fees, SPXV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPXV has performed better with a 24.48% return vs 6.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XRMI.
XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.62%, compared with 0.89% for SPXV.
SPXV is categorized as S&P 500, while XRMI is Derivative Income. SPXV tracks S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while XRMI tracks Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXV and 0.60% for XRMI.
SPXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXV and XRMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer