SPXV vs. QDIV
SPXV (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF) and QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while QDIV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPXV returned 14.80%/yr vs 6.17%/yr for QDIV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QDIV.
Performance
SPXV vs. QDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXV achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than QDIV's 8.21% return.
SPXV
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
QDIV
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.70%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- —
SPXV vs. QDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 12.35% | 18.40% | 28.02% | 30.71% | -20.47% | 28.37% | 18.99% | 33.58% | -11.56% |
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 8.21% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | -0.50% | 28.99% | 0.03% | 29.00% | -12.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXV and QDIV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPXV and QDIV has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPXV vs. QDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXV
QDIV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Technology
SPXV
QDIV
Financial Services
SPXV
QDIV
Communication Services
SPXV
QDIV
Consumer Cyclical
SPXV
QDIV
Industrials
SPXV
QDIV
Consumer Defensive
SPXV
QDIV
Energy
SPXV
QDIV
Utilities
SPXV
QDIV
-
Real Estate
SPXV
QDIV
-
Basic Materials
SPXV
QDIV
Healthcare
SPXV
-
QDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXV vs. QDIV — Risk / Return Rank
SPXV
QDIV
SPXV vs. QDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXV | QDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.21 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 1.74 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 4.51 | +9.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXV | QDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.18 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.41 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.43 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
SPXV vs. QDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXV drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, smaller than the maximum QDIV drawdown of -41.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXV and QDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXV | QDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.34% | -41.20% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -7.97% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.89% | -16.81% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -18.52% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -3.96% | +3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -5.54% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 3.08% | -1.01% |
Volatility
SPXV vs. QDIV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) at 2.61%. This indicates that SPXV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXV | QDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 2.61% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 8.07% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 11.84% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 15.30% | +2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 19.42% | -1.41% |
SPXV vs. QDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QDIV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXV vs. QDIV - Dividend Comparison
SPXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than QDIV's 3.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 3.23% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 0.89% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.67% | 1.11% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.89% | 1.57% | 2.66% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXV and QDIV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXV has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to QDIV (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXV dropped -34.34% vs QDIV's -41.20%.
On 5-year performance, SPXV leads with 14.80% vs 6.17% for QDIV. On fees, SPXV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPXV has performed better with a 14.80% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDIV.
QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.89% for SPXV.
SPXV is categorized as S&P 500, while QDIV is Dividend. SPXV tracks S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXV and 0.20% for QDIV.
SPXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXV and QDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer