SPXU vs. SPYV
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPXU tracks the S&P 500 Index (-300%) while SPYV tracks the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXU returned -41.98%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for SPYV. At a correlation of -0.89, they often move in opposite directions. SPXU charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
SPXU vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -20.19% return, which is significantly lower than SPYV's 7.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXU has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of -41.98%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.11% annualized return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- -20.19%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -43.92%
- 3Y*
- -40.85%
- 5Y*
- -33.55%
- 10Y*
- -41.98%
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
SPXU vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -20.19% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.47% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and SPYV is -0.76, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009 | -0.89 |
The correlation between SPXU and SPYV shifts across timeframes, from -0.89 (all time) to -0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPXU vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXU
SPYV
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SPXU
SPYV
Basic Materials
SPXU
-
SPYV
Communication Services
SPXU
-
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
SPXU
-
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
SPXU
-
SPYV
Energy
SPXU
-
SPYV
Healthcare
SPXU
-
SPYV
Industrials
SPXU
-
SPYV
Real Estate
SPXU
-
SPYV
Technology
SPXU
-
SPYV
Utilities
SPXU
-
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
SPYV
SPXU vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXU | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.36 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 3.24 | -4.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | 12.32 | -13.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than SPYV's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -58.45% | -41.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.11% | -6.22% | -40.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | -17.54% | -66.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -17.89% | -72.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | -36.89% | -62.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -1.24% | -98.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.33% | -8.70% | -84.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.37% | 1.63% | +27.74% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.90%. This indicates that SPXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 2.90% | +11.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 7.33% | +22.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 9.97% | +27.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 14.38% | +36.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.43% | 16.93% | +36.50% |
SPXU vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than SPYV's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.35% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU and SPYV have a correlation of -0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXU has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to SPYV (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 12.11% vs -41.98% for SPXU. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 12.11% return vs -41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPXU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 1.73% for SPYV.
SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%), while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SPXU and 0.04% for SPYV.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer